<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Advances in AR-15 Ammo</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/ammunition-reviews-articles/advances-in-ar-15-ammo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/ammunition-reviews-articles/advances-in-ar-15-ammo</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 01:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: 454lvr</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/ammunition-reviews-articles/advances-in-ar-15-ammo/comment-page-1#comment-26748</link> <dc:creator>454lvr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=185251#comment-26748</guid> <description><![CDATA[Texas and Oklahoma are two that I know of that allow 223 to be used for deer.  Oklahoma requires a 7 round or less magazine in the 223.  If the ar is of the 308 variety you can used the 20 round magazine.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas and Oklahoma are two that I know of that allow 223 to be used for deer.  Oklahoma requires a 7 round or less magazine in the 223.  If the ar is of the 308 variety you can used the 20 round magazine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: capta45</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/ammunition-reviews-articles/advances-in-ar-15-ammo/comment-page-1#comment-24971</link> <dc:creator>capta45</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=185251#comment-24971</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;Slower 1:7 twist rates&quot; - quite certain you meant either &#039;slower velocity bullet&#039; or &#039;faster 1:7 twist rates&#039;.  Obviously a 1:7 twist rate is faster than a 1:9 twist rate and will produce more rotation.  Longer bullets generally need a faster twist rate to properly stabilize. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Slower 1:7 twist rates&#8221; &#8211; quite certain you meant either &#8216;slower velocity bullet&#8217; or &#8216;faster 1:7 twist rates&#8217;.  Obviously a 1:7 twist rate is faster than a 1:9 twist rate and will produce more rotation.  Longer bullets generally need a faster twist rate to properly stabilize.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: retired75th</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/ammunition-reviews-articles/advances-in-ar-15-ammo/comment-page-1#comment-24891</link> <dc:creator>retired75th</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:15:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=185251#comment-24891</guid> <description><![CDATA[There is a concerted ongoing effort to &quot;sell&quot; the 5.56. An effort to get the 5.56 to do what it is not cable of doing.   If the platform,  such as the AR and its variants was not so versatile, the AR in 5.56 would be a dying breed.  It is the flexibility of the AR and not the 5.56 that sells the firearm.   This is the bottom line.   If you are engaging targets at 500 to 600 yes, are you seriously going to rely on 5.56?   Of course not, so why push an inadequate round, except to make money. .  There is a big difference between hitting the bulls eye on a paper target at 500 yds, and killing the enemy  at 500 yds.  If you are hooked on the AR, which is a good weapon, and want to engage real targets at extended range at least rebarrel the weapon.  No firearm is the ideal for all missions and conditions, so base weapon selection on the mission, and not hype from folks with a financial angle.  And one last thing, in what states is it legal to take big game with 5.56 as the author states?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a concerted ongoing effort to &#8220;sell&#8221; the 5.56. An effort to get the 5.56 to do what it is not cable of doing.   If the platform,  such as the AR and its variants was not so versatile, the AR in 5.56 would be a dying breed.  It is the flexibility of the AR and not the 5.56 that sells the firearm.   This is the bottom line.   If you are engaging targets at 500 to 600 yes, are you seriously going to rely on 5.56?   Of course not, so why push an inadequate round, except to make money. .  There is a big difference between hitting the bulls eye on a paper target at 500 yds, and killing the enemy  at 500 yds.  If you are hooked on the AR, which is a good weapon, and want to engage real targets at extended range at least rebarrel the weapon.  No firearm is the ideal for all missions and conditions, so base weapon selection on the mission, and not hype from folks with a financial angle.  And one last thing, in what states is it legal to take big game with 5.56 as the author states?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harold</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/ammunition-reviews-articles/advances-in-ar-15-ammo/comment-page-1#comment-24641</link> <dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=185251#comment-24641</guid> <description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re sticking to .223/5.56 mm, consider rounds that use Barnes TSX copper bullets.  Black Hills makes loadings in both .223 and 5.56 mm, the latter to NATO and military specs, sealed, low flash powder and all that.  They also sell to us their MK262 Mod 1 that you mention.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re sticking to .223/5.56 mm, consider rounds that use Barnes TSX copper bullets.  Black Hills makes loadings in both .223 and 5.56 mm, the latter to NATO and military specs, sealed, low flash powder and all that.  They also sell to us their MK262 Mod 1 that you mention.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 462/475 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-06-19 16:36:15 by W3 Total Cache -->