Counterfeit Optics: Fake Eotechs Snagged at Border

U.S. Customs uncovers counterfeit Eotech optics.

U.S. Customs uncovers counterfeit Eotech optics.

Gun Digest the Magazine has reported, more than once, on warnings from firearms optics manufacturers that consumers needed to watch out for faked copies of their products.  Recently, U.S. Customers snagged a shipment of these fakes, in this case counterfeit holographic sights, with a potential retail value of nearly a half million dollars.

State law enforcement in California, according to the Los Angeles Times, filed criminal charges against three men for allegedly selling the fake optics on the Internet via a company called Field Sport, Inc.

The charges stem from an investigation that began in early March after U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers were conducting a routine mail inspection at an Alaska sorting center and found 700 counterfeit rifle sights and 200 magnifier systems in a shipment sent from China to Field Sports headquarters, the Times noted.

According to the criminal complaint, the three men advertised for sale online about 700 counterfeit EOTech gun sights and 200 magnifier systems. They said the equipment had a retail value of about $475,000. Based in Michigan, EOTech has a copyright on the manufacture and sale of the holographic rifle sights sold by the defendants. The brand is popular with law enforcement and the military.

On its website, EOTech has posted a Counterfeit Alert, explaining how to tell genuine EOTech products from the fakes. Read the alert at:   http://www.eotech-inc.com/counterfeit_notice.php


Resources for Tactical Operators

The Gun Digest Book of Tactical Gear

The Gun Digest Book of Tactical Weapons Assembly/Disassembly

Own the Night: Selection and Use of Tactical Lights and Lasers

Tactical Pistol Shooting: Your Guide to Tactics that Work, 2nd Ed.

One thought on “Counterfeit Optics: Fake Eotechs Snagged at Border

  1. William Bell

    You need to get a new Customs & Border Protection (CBP) Seal, the one in the article went out of date in March 2003, which makes Gun Digest look a bit stupid. The publicity on this incident is still good however.

COMMENT