Nobody Ever Called Them Pretty. . . .

Harrington & Richardson has been out of the handgun business since the company (then doing business as H&R 1871, Inc.) was acquired by Marlin in 2000. Most people probably didn’t even notice.

H&R handguns weren’t ever anything you’d brag about owning, unless maybe it was one of their USRA single-shot .22 target pistols or maybe a nine-shot top-break Model 999 Sportsman. I’ve owned one of the former and two of the latter, and I never felt ashamed of them. I must admit, however, that most of H&R’s pistols and revolvers look positively clunky and stupid compared to, say, a Colt Police Positive or a S&W M39.

But for pure butt-ugliness, nothing could approach H&R’s .32 Self-Loading Pistol and its Model 925 .38 S&W revolver. Hoo boy! The .32 Self-Loader was a licensed knockoff of the British Webley7.65mm Pocket Auto (and was also available in a scaled-down .25 ACP version), but the Model 925 sprang unassisted from H&R’s fevered corporate brow. Neither was a cheaply-made gun; it’s just that their styling was so impossibly awkward that they look weird even to my jaded eyes, which is saying quite a lot.

I’ve tried to include as much information as possible about these guns in the 2011 Standard Catalog of Firearms (21st Edition), but I haven’t quite been able to give them the coverage they probably deserve. However, when you consider that the book contains info on more than 25,000 different firearms from around the world, it’s a pretty good one-volume reference/value guide for the firearms generalist who buys and trades guns fairly regularly — as I do. Check it out here.

Anyway, these two poor, forlorn H&Rs are my candidates for Ugliest Pistol of All Time. In my experience, both were utterly reliable and acceptably accurate, but let’s face it: they’re about as pretty as the southbound end of a northbound mule.

2 thoughts on “Nobody Ever Called Them Pretty. . . .

  1. Editor Dan Shideler Post author

    I stand corrected, Will! I agree that the Rhino is the most horribly awkward revolver I have ever seen. It’s worse than the EAA Windicator and the old Clerke .22 — and that’s saying something.

    Sometimes a gun is so odd-looking that it actually starts looking good, like the Mauser C96. But I can’t find anything good to say about the Rhino. Yeccccch!

    But let’s not forget about the Japanese Nambu Type 94, either. Hoo boy.

  2. Dixie Gunsmithing

    The two H&R’s you show are beauties compared to Savage’s model 1915 and 1917 auto pistol. They are also far better looking than todays Ruger LCR revolver, and the Revolver Rhino by Chiappa. One would about think that the head design engineer’s for these two companies came into work, on the day of their design, and were drunk off their duff.

    When I first saw the Ruger LCR, I remember the one word that floated through my head, “GAG”! Then, I ran across the Chiappa Rhino, and just had to shake my head, “NO”!

    Personally, they couldn’t run fast enough to give me one of those pistols, just over the looks alone. I would take either of the H&R’s in their place, collector value or not.

    Will Matney
    Dixie Gunsmithing

COMMENT