<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shot Strings, No. 3</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2007</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2007</guid> <description><![CDATA[You&#039;d think that, but it&#039;s easier for them to just eliminate the socially unacceptable group. On an up note, see the comment from &quot;wildwilliam&quot;--seems those above have decided to take the reticles off us, at least for the time being. Let&#039;s take the good news for what it is, while keeping an eye on the subject, as it&#039;s bound to come up again. Thanks for your input!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think that, but it&#8217;s easier for them to just eliminate the socially unacceptable group. On an up note, see the comment from &#8220;wildwilliam&#8221;&#8211;seems those above have decided to take the reticles off us, at least for the time being. Let&#8217;s take the good news for what it is, while keeping an eye on the subject, as it&#8217;s bound to come up again. Thanks for your input!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WildGame</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2005</link> <dc:creator>WildGame</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2005</guid> <description><![CDATA[The BLM manages 274 million acres.  You would think there would be plenty of space to separate the Yuppies from hunters.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BLM manages 274 million acres.  You would think there would be plenty of space to separate the Yuppies from hunters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2004</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:11:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2004</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wonderful--I very much appreciate the update from you. Very good news on Thanksgiving, indeed!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful&#8211;I very much appreciate the update from you. Very good news on Thanksgiving, indeed!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2003</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:10:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2003</guid> <description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, its seems more and more that political correctness IS made to seem like the right thing. Indeed, it seems that political correctness has shifted to become an agenda of homogenizing a population so that we&#039;ll &quot;all get along&quot; as our differences are erased. It&#039;s one thing to be polite and respect others--two things sorely lacking in today&#039;s society--but when you take away the individuality that we should be celebrating in one another, you run the risk not only of all becoming a dull neighborhood of Stepford Wives, you staunch the inate creativeness of simply being human that drives us forward and keeps us evolving. There you have it--not exactly guns and shooting, but food for thought nonetheless.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, its seems more and more that political correctness IS made to seem like the right thing. Indeed, it seems that political correctness has shifted to become an agenda of homogenizing a population so that we&#8217;ll &#8220;all get along&#8221; as our differences are erased. It&#8217;s one thing to be polite and respect others&#8211;two things sorely lacking in today&#8217;s society&#8211;but when you take away the individuality that we should be celebrating in one another, you run the risk not only of all becoming a dull neighborhood of Stepford Wives, you staunch the inate creativeness of simply being human that drives us forward and keeps us evolving. There you have it&#8211;not exactly guns and shooting, but food for thought nonetheless.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2002</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2002</guid> <description><![CDATA[Marty, wonderful commentary. Thank you very much for your input. I can&#039;t say that had that been me instead of you on the Tonto hearing about no hunting because of a fire hazard, I wouldn&#039;t have felt there was an ulterior motive to such restrictions, either. And it souds that if, from your description of the Forest employee&#039;s body language and answers, he is indeed just towing the company line. Unfortunate that he couldn&#039;t be more forthcoming, but he has a job to keep, too.Are we paranoid about issues such as these? Maybe, but it&#039;s difficult not to be. The &quot;they&#039;re out to get us&quot; mentality is a tough one to get around, because there&#039;s so often ample proof that every time gun owners and shooters give an inch, the proverbial mile is taken. I applaud your insightful response (and doubly your politelness to the employee when you ended the conversation--lots of folks could learn from you). Stay vigilant, stay polite, stay involved, talk about your observations here and other appropriate places, and fight the good fight the right way.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty, wonderful commentary. Thank you very much for your input. I can&#8217;t say that had that been me instead of you on the Tonto hearing about no hunting because of a fire hazard, I wouldn&#8217;t have felt there was an ulterior motive to such restrictions, either. And it souds that if, from your description of the Forest employee&#8217;s body language and answers, he is indeed just towing the company line. Unfortunate that he couldn&#8217;t be more forthcoming, but he has a job to keep, too.</p><p>Are we paranoid about issues such as these? Maybe, but it&#8217;s difficult not to be. The &#8220;they&#8217;re out to get us&#8221; mentality is a tough one to get around, because there&#8217;s so often ample proof that every time gun owners and shooters give an inch, the proverbial mile is taken. I applaud your insightful response (and doubly your politelness to the employee when you ended the conversation&#8211;lots of folks could learn from you). Stay vigilant, stay polite, stay involved, talk about your observations here and other appropriate places, and fight the good fight the right way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2001</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2001</guid> <description><![CDATA[Excellent point about the deer/car accident rates (among your others). This is a point too often left out of hunting and land use debates. Thank you for your input!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point about the deer/car accident rates (among your others). This is a point too often left out of hunting and land use debates. Thank you for your input!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-2000</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer L.S. Pearsall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:51:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-2000</guid> <description><![CDATA[Gunny, couple things. One, iff you had clicked through to the U.S. News article, you&#039;d have seen that no regulation was named there. In fact, it said regulatoins were being drafted--and last time I checked, &quot;being drafted&quot; meant such a thing is in the creation stage. I Googled quite a bit to see if I could find anything in ink that looked official regarding such a proposal and failed, so I assume that, just as the article said, no regulations have been formalized to even the point that public commentary session dates have been named. However, given the rather reliable reputation of the U.S. News and World Report, I hardly doubt the article&#039;s author made up the article just to incite a riot among gun owners who use BLM land to shoot on, merely that Mr. Bedard had come across some information about some governement proposals in their infancy that could have an impact on shooters.As for your comments about political screeds and wanting to read about guns and shooting, I fail to see where this article was NOT about guns and shooting. Was this an editorial? Absolutely. But this is a blog, not a gun or products review column, and I have a reasonable amount of freedom to choose what topics to write about.--there are ample gun writers out there covering every new gun, box of ammo, and latest gear to hit the market (including other bloggers and authors on the Gun Digest site), and while I may eventually insert such reviews from time to time, it&#039;s unlikely such essays will be the meat and potatoes of my essays. Personally, I try to find something different each time I put something up, something that will resonate somewhere, sometime, across a wide variety of gun owners and recreational shooters and promote useful conversation. To that end, it&#039;s just fine that you didn&#039;t appreciate the topic I covered here. Others did. Nobody can please everybody all the time, including me--but I don&#039;t go out of my way to spare anyone anthing except insult or injury. And, so, while I hope you&#039;ll join me here occassionally to read about the guns and shooting issues that mean something to you, it&#039;s also okay to &quot;turn the channel&quot; when I don&#039;t.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunny, couple things. One, iff you had clicked through to the U.S. News article, you&#8217;d have seen that no regulation was named there. In fact, it said regulatoins were being drafted&#8211;and last time I checked, &#8220;being drafted&#8221; meant such a thing is in the creation stage. I Googled quite a bit to see if I could find anything in ink that looked official regarding such a proposal and failed, so I assume that, just as the article said, no regulations have been formalized to even the point that public commentary session dates have been named. However, given the rather reliable reputation of the U.S. News and World Report, I hardly doubt the article&#8217;s author made up the article just to incite a riot among gun owners who use BLM land to shoot on, merely that Mr. Bedard had come across some information about some governement proposals in their infancy that could have an impact on shooters.</p><p>As for your comments about political screeds and wanting to read about guns and shooting, I fail to see where this article was NOT about guns and shooting. Was this an editorial? Absolutely. But this is a blog, not a gun or products review column, and I have a reasonable amount of freedom to choose what topics to write about.&#8211;there are ample gun writers out there covering every new gun, box of ammo, and latest gear to hit the market (including other bloggers and authors on the Gun Digest site), and while I may eventually insert such reviews from time to time, it&#8217;s unlikely such essays will be the meat and potatoes of my essays. Personally, I try to find something different each time I put something up, something that will resonate somewhere, sometime, across a wide variety of gun owners and recreational shooters and promote useful conversation. To that end, it&#8217;s just fine that you didn&#8217;t appreciate the topic I covered here. Others did. Nobody can please everybody all the time, including me&#8211;but I don&#8217;t go out of my way to spare anyone anthing except insult or injury. And, so, while I hope you&#8217;ll join me here occassionally to read about the guns and shooting issues that mean something to you, it&#8217;s also okay to &#8220;turn the channel&#8221; when I don&#8217;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wildwilliam</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-1999</link> <dc:creator>wildwilliam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:55:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-1999</guid> <description><![CDATA[In case no one else has heard, here&#039;s a news headline, from today&#039;s Huffington Post -
&quot;WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration said Wednesday it will not impose new restrictions on recreational shooting on public lands, a Thanksgiving gift for thousands of gun owners and hunters concerned about a draft plan to limit target shooting near residential areas.&quot;
So we can go back to reporting and blogging on other issues!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case no one else has heard, here&#8217;s a news headline, from today&#8217;s Huffington Post -<br
/> &#8220;WASHINGTON &#8212; The Obama administration said Wednesday it will not impose new restrictions on recreational shooting on public lands, a Thanksgiving gift for thousands of gun owners and hunters concerned about a draft plan to limit target shooting near residential areas.&#8221;<br
/> So we can go back to reporting and blogging on other issues!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: trappertom</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-1998</link> <dc:creator>trappertom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:22:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-1998</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m tired of sportsman paying the price for paranoid yuppies. If they don&#039;t like us hunting on public lands then they should stay home or go somewhere else! If we tried to kick them off hunting lands, there would be quite an uproar for sure. The Government always sides with the politically correct side of an issue, instead of showing some balls and doing the right thing.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tired of sportsman paying the price for paranoid yuppies. If they don&#8217;t like us hunting on public lands then they should stay home or go somewhere else! If we tried to kick them off hunting lands, there would be quite an uproar for sure. The Government always sides with the politically correct side of an issue, instead of showing some balls and doing the right thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gunny</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/the-hunting-guns-blog/shot-strings-no-3/comment-page-1#comment-1997</link> <dc:creator>Gunny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=60560#comment-1997</guid> <description><![CDATA[The article give us a full expression of opinion but did not tell what the regulation was. What public lands? Where? How close to what city? When was it announced? Was there public comment? Who said no guns? I don&#039;t think Obama said so, some BLM middle manager said so. Are we going to be reading this stuff through the next year? Spare me these political screeds. I want to read about guns and shooting.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article give us a full expression of opinion but did not tell what the regulation was. What public lands? Where? How close to what city? When was it announced? Was there public comment? Who said no guns? I don&#8217;t think Obama said so, some BLM middle manager said so. Are we going to be reading this stuff through the next year? Spare me these political screeds. I want to read about guns and shooting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 503/621 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-05-23 18:58:30 by W3 Total Cache -->