<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Bullet Ballistics 101: Pressure, Velocity &amp; Distance</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/wayne-van-zwoll-on-firearms/bullet-ballistics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/wayne-van-zwoll-on-firearms/bullet-ballistics</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: native4</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/wayne-van-zwoll-on-firearms/bullet-ballistics/comment-page-1#comment-26725</link> <dc:creator>native4</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:25:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=172191#comment-26725</guid> <description><![CDATA[I am still &quot;breaking in &quot; my Dakota (African) 76 chambered in H&amp;H .400 magnum.I experienced a cracked shell and am in process of having the  loader examine the brass to see if we have a pressure problem or a bad piece of brass.Ever since I was sold this rifle chambered in the H&amp;H .400 I wanted to ask your opinion of this Wildcat cartridge.I have cartridges loaded with both Woodleigh FMJ and Swift A-Frames ( 400g.)I also have been advised to hunt dangerous game  ( I plan to take it to Africa for Cape Buffalo) with the Swifts as the Woodleighs may not like the velocity of tis round.I love the rifle and the feel so far.Bottom line? What is your opinion of my decision to go with the shorter action and .400 H&amp;H vs. the more traditional choice of , say .416 Rigby.Thank you.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still &#8220;breaking in &#8221; my Dakota (African) 76 chambered in H&amp;H .400 magnum.</p><p>I experienced a cracked shell and am in process of having the  loader examine the brass to see if we have a pressure problem or a bad piece of brass.</p><p>Ever since I was sold this rifle chambered in the H&amp;H .400 I wanted to ask your opinion of this Wildcat cartridge.</p><p>I have cartridges loaded with both Woodleigh FMJ and Swift A-Frames ( 400g.)</p><p>I also have been advised to hunt dangerous game  ( I plan to take it to Africa for Cape Buffalo) with the Swifts as the Woodleighs may not like the velocity of tis round.</p><p>I love the rifle and the feel so far.</p><p>Bottom line? What is your opinion of my decision to go with the shorter action and .400 H&amp;H vs. the more traditional choice of , say .416 Rigby.</p><p>Thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diver6106</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/wayne-van-zwoll-on-firearms/bullet-ballistics/comment-page-1#comment-20181</link> <dc:creator>Diver6106</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=172191#comment-20181</guid> <description><![CDATA[The article on .223 vs 5.56 is GREAT! Is there a similar issue with .308 vs 7.62 in military arms? I shoot an FN FAL-LAR, semi-auto, Belgium made from Gun South. I would like to see a note or similar article on the issues.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article on .223 vs 5.56 is GREAT! Is there a similar issue with .308 vs 7.62 in military arms? I shoot an FN FAL-LAR, semi-auto, Belgium made from Gun South. I would like to see a note or similar article on the issues.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 341/447 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-05-24 03:15:34 by W3 Total Cache -->