True to Winchester’s claim, Blind Side does appear to respond to different choke constrictions quite accurately. Percentages – and, yes, we did take the time to count several rounds for an average – confirmed modified to print as approximately 63 percent; full tubes accounted for roughly 73 to 75 percent of the #2 Hex Shot pellets in the 1-3/8 ounce load into a 30-inch circle at 40 yards.
Overall, I was impressed with the ammunition’s performance on the range at measured distances from 25 to 45 yards – actually, quite impressed, and this including multiple penetration tests using ballistic gelatin. Consistency and uniformity were two common denominators I witnessed throughout the pattern tests, and these, again, at 25, 35, and 45 yards.
We shot surprisingly challenging mallards at Nilo, and while I can say the Blind Side performed well, I can’t say its performance was radically better than that of other quality steel loads, e.g. Winchester’s Super-X Steel, running at comparable velocities. I did notice birds hit squarely were – or so it seemed to my eye – undeniably dead, and very dead at that, in the air; however, I did see a small number of drop-legs, i.e. crippled birds, which required a follow-up round. Inconclusive, I’m thinking, as gunners will see identical and time-to-time multiple-hit scenarios with any of the modern steel shotshells on the market today.
Curious as to Blind Side’s claim of “massive wound channels…and blistering trauma,” I watched as engineers field-necropsied several of the mallards dropped during the morning’s shoot. While there was certainly no denying the birds were indeed dead I really couldn’t tell much difference internally between a mallard killed by Blind Side, and one tagged by a similar charge of round steel pellets. That’s internally, mind you.
While hunting on Utah’s Great Salt Lake I, and some hunting partners, noticed Blind Side’s tendency to “pillow case” birds. I’m assuming it’s the shape of the Hex Shot that cuts feathers quite impressively; the resulting clouds of drifting down, primaries, and body feathers is very noticeable.
But cutting feathers and killing ducks – consistently killing ducks dead in the air – are two radically different things. Does Winchester’s newest designer non-toxic waterfowl load do both? Yes. Does Blind Side do it better, i.e. more efficiently, than a comparably quick 1-3/8 ounce charge of steel #2s? At this point in my testing, I can’t unequivocally answer in the affirmative; not, however, until I’ve had a chance to shoot the new offering side-by-side against traditional steel. And I’m very much looking forward to that experiment.
Until that happens, Blind Side is a definite unique alternative to that Same Old Steel Syndrome. Every little bit helps in the duck blind.
This article appeared in the October 24, 2011 issue of Gun Digest the Magazine.
Recommended resources for shotgunners:
Shop GunDigestStore.com for more books, DVDs and downloads
Pages: 1 2
About the Author: M.D. Johnson is an outdoors writer who has published articles at numerous publications as one half of M&J Outdoors. He's authored several books about the outdoors, including "Successful Duck Hunting" and "Guide to Pheasant Hunting."
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.