<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gun Review: Remington R1 1911</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/firearm-gun-reviews/gun-review-remington-r1-1911/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/firearm-gun-reviews/gun-review-remington-r1-1911</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Johndoe</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/firearm-gun-reviews/gun-review-remington-r1-1911/comment-page-1#comment-1714</link> <dc:creator>Johndoe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:21:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=57595#comment-1714</guid> <description><![CDATA[I checked one out this summer while 1911 shopping and found the R1 to be a bit tacky.  The paint or whatever they put on it would not be bad for a cheap knockoff gun company to do but a company like Remington should have been able to do better.  They should have at least parkerized it if not an actually bluing job.  The updated sights were a nice touch.  The firing pin safety was a bit ridiculous though.  The 1911 is a combat weapon, if you are too uncomfortable with a combat weapon and feel you need unnecessary safeties like the firing pin block or a magazine disconnect you should probably shop around for a different style gun.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked one out this summer while 1911 shopping and found the R1 to be a bit tacky.  The paint or whatever they put on it would not be bad for a cheap knockoff gun company to do but a company like Remington should have been able to do better.  They should have at least parkerized it if not an actually bluing job.  The updated sights were a nice touch.  The firing pin safety was a bit ridiculous though.  The 1911 is a combat weapon, if you are too uncomfortable with a combat weapon and feel you need unnecessary safeties like the firing pin block or a magazine disconnect you should probably shop around for a different style gun.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: x90</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/firearm-gun-reviews/gun-review-remington-r1-1911/comment-page-1#comment-1430</link> <dc:creator>x90</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=57595#comment-1430</guid> <description><![CDATA[I may be mistaken, but from what I have read the 1911&#039;s for WWII marked Remington were made by Remington-Rand, the typewriter company.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be mistaken, but from what I have read the 1911&#8242;s for WWII marked Remington were made by Remington-Rand, the typewriter company.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GunnyBob</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/firearm-gun-reviews/gun-review-remington-r1-1911/comment-page-1#comment-1427</link> <dc:creator>GunnyBob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:38:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=57595#comment-1427</guid> <description><![CDATA[Part (most) of the reason I&#039;m all but deaf is being skinny enough to fit inside of spiderholes back in the good old days and make big booms with my 1911. As a Marine we were issued the latest of WWII technology...in Vietnam... but for the life of me I don&#039;t remember if my 1911 was of Remington manufacture.Hit the target high center of mass and it dropped without nary a twitch. Lots faster than drilling little pinholes with the 5.56. Lots.Thank you for the well done article on one of my favorite handguns.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part (most) of the reason I&#8217;m all but deaf is being skinny enough to fit inside of spiderholes back in the good old days and make big booms with my 1911. As a Marine we were issued the latest of WWII technology&#8230;in Vietnam&#8230; but for the life of me I don&#8217;t remember if my 1911 was of Remington manufacture.</p><p>Hit the target high center of mass and it dropped without nary a twitch. Lots faster than drilling little pinholes with the 5.56. Lots.</p><p>Thank you for the well done article on one of my favorite handguns.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 439/450 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-05-24 16:18:04 by W3 Total Cache -->