<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Look at 1911 Sights</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/a-look-at-1911-sights/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/a-look-at-1911-sights</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: SmithKoWitz</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/a-look-at-1911-sights/comment-page-1#comment-15511</link> <dc:creator>SmithKoWitz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:17:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=167151#comment-15511</guid> <description><![CDATA[Interesting observation you&#039;ve experienced with Kimbers. I have just the opposite remark; it seems that the Trijicon sights on my Springfield are useless, because they are dimmer and seem smaller than the Meprolight night sights. I prefer the Meprolights sights. I also have a S&amp;W w/VTAC night sights, which seem useless in shooting range lighting, but again, they seem small.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation you&#8217;ve experienced with Kimbers. I have just the opposite remark; it seems that the Trijicon sights on my Springfield are useless, because they are dimmer and seem smaller than the Meprolight night sights. I prefer the Meprolights sights. I also have a S&amp;W w/VTAC night sights, which seem useless in shooting range lighting, but again, they seem small.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gunslinger454</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/a-look-at-1911-sights/comment-page-1#comment-15411</link> <dc:creator>gunslinger454</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=167151#comment-15411</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never been all that impressed with the Meprolight Night Sights used on Kimbers.  During the day they provide an excellent sight picture, but at night the rear sight overpowers the front sight on every Kimber I&#039;ve had the opportunity to handle in low light.  Meprolight needs to follow the lead of other night sight manufacturers and make the front sight tritium insert larger &amp; brighter than those used in the rear sight!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been all that impressed with the Meprolight Night Sights used on Kimbers.  During the day they provide an excellent sight picture, but at night the rear sight overpowers the front sight on every Kimber I&#8217;ve had the opportunity to handle in low light.  Meprolight needs to follow the lead of other night sight manufacturers and make the front sight tritium insert larger &amp; brighter than those used in the rear sight!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 337/441 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-05-21 14:42:13 by W3 Total Cache -->