<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Revolver Vs. Auto for CCW?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/revolver-vs-auto-for-ccw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/revolver-vs-auto-for-ccw</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Motor-T</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/revolver-vs-auto-for-ccw/comment-page-1#comment-26078</link> <dc:creator>Motor-T</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=167631#comment-26078</guid> <description><![CDATA[One of the aspects of the revolver vs auto debate that is rarely discussed is trigger weight. Most factory new revolvers have a 10-12lb triggers. Many modern service pistols have 5-7 lb triggers. All other things being equal a lighter trigger is easier to shoot accurately, and many shooters will shoot a modern semi auto more accurately than a revolver.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the aspects of the revolver vs auto debate that is rarely discussed is trigger weight. Most factory new revolvers have a 10-12lb triggers. Many modern service pistols have 5-7 lb triggers. All other things being equal a lighter trigger is easier to shoot accurately, and many shooters will shoot a modern semi auto more accurately than a revolver.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SmithKoWitz</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/revolver-vs-auto-for-ccw/comment-page-1#comment-15501</link> <dc:creator>SmithKoWitz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:12:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=167631#comment-15501</guid> <description><![CDATA[I thought you were starting an argument? Personally, I carry a semi-auto most all the time. Varies between an LCP, Kahr MK40, SAEMP40 &amp; Kimber SCHDPRO; mostly carry the 2nd &amp; 3rd listed and sometimes the LCP as backup.  As for Revolvers, I would actually say I think too that they are more reliable (not that I&#039;ve had any trouble with any of the guns mentioned), but revolvers are simple. The only issue I ever had were rounds that must have had to a high a pressure and they did not want to eject (they were factory rounds too). The sad part, it was a J frame model 632 327magnum. Never had any trouble with my model 686+ or 629, but they are a little on the large side for CCW; except in colder months. When I find a holster I like I just might start carrying the 686+ with the 3&quot; barrel. I actually find it extremely accurate and quicker for follow up shots that are accurate compared to most semi-autos. I also don&#039;t notice accuracy variances with different brands of ammo as I do with semi-autos. Yep, I like my 7 shot 357/38 if you desire, but it&#039;s a bit hefty; so are the EMP and the Kimber SCHDPRO. The model 632 327magnum is a nasty little bugger for recoil, I can only imagine what a 357 must be like in a J frame (never shot one, yet) or a Scandium J frame, even better  . . .]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you were starting an argument? Personally, I carry a semi-auto most all the time. Varies between an LCP, Kahr MK40, SAEMP40 &amp; Kimber SCHDPRO; mostly carry the 2nd &amp; 3rd listed and sometimes the LCP as backup.  As for Revolvers, I would actually say I think too that they are more reliable (not that I&#8217;ve had any trouble with any of the guns mentioned), but revolvers are simple. The only issue I ever had were rounds that must have had to a high a pressure and they did not want to eject (they were factory rounds too). The sad part, it was a J frame model 632 327magnum. Never had any trouble with my model 686+ or 629, but they are a little on the large side for CCW; except in colder months. When I find a holster I like I just might start carrying the 686+ with the 3&#8243; barrel. I actually find it extremely accurate and quicker for follow up shots that are accurate compared to most semi-autos. I also don&#8217;t notice accuracy variances with different brands of ammo as I do with semi-autos. Yep, I like my 7 shot 357/38 if you desire, but it&#8217;s a bit hefty; so are the EMP and the Kimber SCHDPRO. The model 632 327magnum is a nasty little bugger for recoil, I can only imagine what a 357 must be like in a J frame (never shot one, yet) or a Scandium J frame, even better  . . .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/handgun-reviews-articles/revolver-vs-auto-for-ccw/comment-page-1#comment-15441</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=167631#comment-15441</guid> <description><![CDATA[My two favorite handguns for CCW use are a S&amp;W Model 442 with its concealed hammer and a Kahr CW40.  Both have Crimson Trace laser sights and are loaded witht he best JHP ammo I can find in either .38 Special +P or .40 S&amp;W caliber.  The Smith is the odds-on pick for summer wear as I can put it in a pocket holster and wear cargo-type shorts that conceal it and the speed-strip of extra ammo.  When I have more clothing on, out comes the Kahr.  I have various holsters for it, but lately favor the Versa-Carry device that allows for IWB use without a bulky holster.  I have confidnece that I can get the job done with either handgun and the laser sight aids in fast target recognition/aquisition, plus has an intimidation factor.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two favorite handguns for CCW use are a S&amp;W Model 442 with its concealed hammer and a Kahr CW40.  Both have Crimson Trace laser sights and are loaded witht he best JHP ammo I can find in either .38 Special +P or .40 S&amp;W caliber.  The Smith is the odds-on pick for summer wear as I can put it in a pocket holster and wear cargo-type shorts that conceal it and the speed-strip of extra ammo.  When I have more clothing on, out comes the Kahr.  I have various holsters for it, but lately favor the Versa-Carry device that allows for IWB use without a bulky holster.  I have confidnece that I can get the job done with either handgun and the laser sight aids in fast target recognition/aquisition, plus has an intimidation factor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 364/476 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-05-24 03:01:31 by W3 Total Cache -->