<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Classic Guns: &#8220;Vintage Carry&#8221; and the Colt Model 1903 Hammerless Pistol</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol</link> <description>Expert advice from the world&#039;s leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gear</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 01:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: gunslinger454</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol/comment-page-1#comment-5171</link> <dc:creator>gunslinger454</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:43:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=78231#comment-5171</guid> <description><![CDATA[While I&#039;ve always been a fan of the .380ACP version of the firearm mentioned in the article, the Colt Model 1908 Pocket Model Hammerless, I think that I would have to simply go with an older version of what I carry now: the 1911 in .45ACP, although a 1911 in the Colt .38 Super Automatic would be a good choice too!  Or maybe a 4&quot; S&amp;W Model 27 in .357 Magnum...or a Colt New Service &#039;Fitz Special&#039; in .45 Colt (except with the trigger guard left intact!)...or maybe a Merwin &amp; Hulbert Pocket Army in &#039;.44 Winchester&#039; (.44-40)...or...well...there are just too many good options to choose from!!!Still, the Colt Model 1903 Hammerless Pistol would NOT be on that list.  The gun itself is fantastic, but the .32ACP was too underpowered then, and it is too underpowered now!!!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;ve always been a fan of the .380ACP version of the firearm mentioned in the article, the Colt Model 1908 Pocket Model Hammerless, I think that I would have to simply go with an older version of what I carry now: the 1911 in .45ACP, although a 1911 in the Colt .38 Super Automatic would be a good choice too!  Or maybe a 4&#8243; S&amp;W Model 27 in .357 Magnum&#8230;or a Colt New Service &#8216;Fitz Special&#8217; in .45 Colt (except with the trigger guard left intact!)&#8230;or maybe a Merwin &amp; Hulbert Pocket Army in &#8216;.44 Winchester&#8217; (.44-40)&#8230;or&#8230;well&#8230;there are just too many good options to choose from!!!</p><p>Still, the Colt Model 1903 Hammerless Pistol would NOT be on that list.  The gun itself is fantastic, but the .32ACP was too underpowered then, and it is too underpowered now!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AllenG</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol/comment-page-1#comment-5161</link> <dc:creator>AllenG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:09:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=78231#comment-5161</guid> <description><![CDATA[I suppose it wouldn&#039;t be much different than the one above, except that it is much more powerful. I would carry a Russian Tokarev TT-33 in 7.62 x 25mm. (Or any of the European satellite state copies) The round can penetrate body armor, and the gun itself is fairly compact. With a little work I&#039;m sure it could be cut down to accommodate even smaller spaces. The Russian rounds have really been ignored by Americans due to their prejudice towards Soviet era anything.I&#039;m one of the converts that heard what his enemy combatant instructor was saying about their superior small arms when we were briefed on strategy back in the 80s. The explosion of AKs and Dragunovs in the U.S. after embargoes were lifted is no accident.I realize that the TT-33 doesn&#039;t strictly fit the pre-war category just because the U.S. waited to join WWII until Dec. 7th. 1941, but I won&#039;t tell anyone if you don&#039;t.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it wouldn&#8217;t be much different than the one above, except that it is much more powerful. I would carry a Russian Tokarev TT-33 in 7.62 x 25mm. (Or any of the European satellite state copies) The round can penetrate body armor, and the gun itself is fairly compact. With a little work I&#8217;m sure it could be cut down to accommodate even smaller spaces. The Russian rounds have really been ignored by Americans due to their prejudice towards Soviet era anything.</p><p>I&#8217;m one of the converts that heard what his enemy combatant instructor was saying about their superior small arms when we were briefed on strategy back in the 80s. The explosion of AKs and Dragunovs in the U.S. after embargoes were lifted is no accident.</p><p>I realize that the TT-33 doesn&#8217;t strictly fit the pre-war category just because the U.S. waited to join WWII until Dec. 7th. 1941, but I won&#8217;t tell anyone if you don&#8217;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tribune6</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol/comment-page-1#comment-5131</link> <dc:creator>Tribune6</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:20:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=78231#comment-5131</guid> <description><![CDATA[The vintage Gun I carried for awhile was a C96 broomhandle in a shoulder holster under a field jacket. Impressive but not practical.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vintage Gun I carried for awhile was a C96 broomhandle in a shoulder holster under a field jacket. Impressive but not practical.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sesquiculus</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol/comment-page-1#comment-5121</link> <dc:creator>sesquiculus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:55:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=78231#comment-5121</guid> <description><![CDATA[S&amp;W model 3 safety hammerless in 38 S&amp;W.  Pre-1899 antique status gives certain legal advantages many places. If you get stuck overnight at an NYC airport,  you will not get arrested. You can even ship it to yourself in the mail.  Gotta be willing to reload your own ammo.  Alternate: cut-barrel S&amp;W new Model 3 in 44 Russian or 44/40.  Seen several-- must have been a common modification for pocket carry.  ALL are antiques.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;W model 3 safety hammerless in 38 S&amp;W.  Pre-1899 antique status gives certain legal advantages many places. If you get stuck overnight at an NYC airport,  you will not get arrested. You can even ship it to yourself in the mail.  Gotta be willing to reload your own ammo.  Alternate: cut-barrel S&amp;W new Model 3 in 44 Russian or 44/40.  Seen several&#8211; must have been a common modification for pocket carry.  ALL are antiques.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: maninho</title><link>http://www.gundigest.com/vintage-gun-history-articles/classic-guns-vintage-carry-and-the-colt-model-1903-hammerless-pistol/comment-page-1#comment-5111</link> <dc:creator>maninho</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:53:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gundigest.com/?p=78231#comment-5111</guid> <description><![CDATA[Among pre-WWII handguns, I would choose a Walther PP in .380 (9mm Kurz) caliber. A fine double action pistol with a good safety and a bit more powerful than the .32 Walther
PP in .32 (7.65mm) caliber I used to wear when I had a carry permit before gun laws were unduly over-tightened here in Brazil.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among pre-WWII handguns, I would choose a Walther PP in .380 (9mm Kurz) caliber. A fine double action pistol with a good safety and a bit more powerful than the .32 Walther<br
/> PP in .32 (7.65mm) caliber I used to wear when I had a carry permit before gun laws were unduly over-tightened here in Brazil.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 408/519 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3pvexk84ayvwf.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.gundigest.com @ 2013-06-20 01:47:54 by W3 Total Cache -->